In Mourning Slain Filmmaker, Dutch Confront Limitations of Their Tolerance
By CRAIG S. SMITH
Published: November 10, 2004
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/10/international/europe/10dutch.html?th  (must register to view original article)

AMSTERDAM, Nov. 9 - Anger percolated through the crowd gathered Tuesday night outside the funeral for the Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, who was killed a week ago on an Amsterdam street by a man the police described as a Muslim extremist.

That anger is adding new fuel to a public debate over conservative Islam in Europe's most liberal society, one that had already become a no-holds-barred affair even before the killing of Mr. van Gogh, who had repeatedly used epithets against Muslims. His killing has polarized the country, giving the rest of Europe a disturbing glimpse of what may be in store if relations with the Continent's growing immigrant communities are not managed more adeptly.

Officials suspect that a fire at an Islamic elementary school on Tuesday in Uden, in the south, was arson, part of what the Dutch authorities fear are reprisals after Mr. van Gogh's killing, The Associated Press reported. It said the authorities had reported that Muslim sites had been the target of a half-dozen attacks in the past week.

In what seemed to be retaliation, arsonists tried to burn down Protestant churches in Rotterdam, Utrecht and Amersfoort for the bombing of a Muslim elementary school in Eindhoven on Monday, The Associated Press quoted the police as saying.

The attacks have scratched the patina of tolerance on which the Dutch have long prided themselves, particularly here, in a city where the scent of hashish trails in the air, prostitutes beckon from red-lighted storefront brothels and Hells Angels live side by side with Hare Krishnas. But many Dutch now say that for years that the tradition of tolerance had suppressed an open debate about the challenges of integrating conservative Muslims.

Jan Colijn, 46, a bookkeeper from the central Dutch town of Gorinchem, who was at the funeral, complained that the generous Dutch social welfare system had allowed Muslim immigrants to isolate themselves. Because of that trend, "there is a kind of Muslim fascism emerging here," he said. "The government must find a way to break these communities open."

Another man, who declined to give his name, was more succinct: "Now, it's war."

For many years, such criticism of Islam and Islamic customs, even among Dutch extremists, was considered taboo, despite deep frustrations that had built up against conservative Islam.

Many here say this began to change after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, when the Netherlands, like many countries, began seriously to consider the dangers of political Islam. The debate fueled an anti-immigration movement and helped propel the career of Pim Fortuyn, a populist politician who was killed by an environmental activist shortly before national elections in 2002.

By all accounts here, Mr. Fortuyn's killing removed any remaining brakes on the debate surrounding immigrants.

"After Pim Fortuyn's murder, there were no limitations on what you could say," said Edwin Bakker, a terrorism expert at the Netherlands Institute of International Relations in The Hague. "It has become a climate in which insulting people is the norm."

He and others said the public discourse, even among members of government, had reached an extraordinary pitch and included language that went far beyond the limits set for public forums in the United States.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, member of Parliament and one of a handful of politicians threatened with death by Islamic extremists, publicly called the Prophet Muhammad a "pervert" and a "tyrant." She made a film with Mr. van Gogh condemning sexual abuse among Muslim women, who were portrayed with Koranic verses written on their bare skin.

Mr. van Gogh himself was one of the most outspoken critics of fundamentalist Muslims and favored an epithet for conservative Muslims that referred to bestiality with a goat. He used the term often in his public statements, including a column he wrote for a widely read free newspaper and during radio broadcasts and television appearances.

The cumulative effect made Mr. van Gogh, a distant relation of Vincent van Gogh, a kind of cult clown on one side of the debate, and a reviled hatemonger on the other. The debate became so caustic that the Dutch intelligence service issued a report in March warning that the unrestrained language could encourage radicalization of the country's Muslim youth and drive people into the arms of terrorist recruiters. The conservative Islamic revival that has swept the Arab world from the Middle East to North Africa in recent years has reached Europe, where frustrated second- and third-generation Arab immigrants frequently say they feel rejected by European society.

While only about 20 percent of the estimated 900,000 Muslims in the Netherlands practice their religion, according to one government study, officials say as many as 5 percent of Muslims in the country follow a conservative form of Islam. Most, like Muhammad Bouyeri, the 26-year-old arrested by police in Mr. van Gogh's killing, are from the country's Moroccan community.

There are about 300,000 people of Moroccan descent in the Netherlands today. The ratcheting up of the anti-immigration debate has alienated many of them from Dutch society and, many people argue, helped fragment Muslims here.

Jean Tillie, a professor of political science at the University of Amsterdam, said the debate had broken down a network that connected even the most extremist Muslim groups to the more moderate Muslim voices. He cited an Amsterdam government advisory board that brought together Moroccans and fostered communication and cohesion among all Muslims.

"Those groups participating didn't agree with each other, but they met together with the collective mission of advising the city government," he said.

The board was abolished a year ago, he said, as a result of the anti-immigration debate. He said that financing for other ethnic organizations had shrunk and that outreach policies had also been abandoned.

As a result, Mr. Tillie said, there has been a sharp decline in political participation and trust among Muslims in the Netherlands and between Muslims and the broader Dutch society.

"That worries me," he said. "When you break the networks, the extremists within these communities become isolated and become more radical and more violent."

At El Tawheed mosque, considered by many people here to be the epicenter of militancy in Amsterdam, Farid Zaari, the mosque's spokesman, argued that pressure from the debate has hindered the Muslim community's ability to control its militant youth.

"If we bring these people into the mosque, it is possible to change their thoughts, but few mosques dare to because if you do, you're branded," he said.

Dutch news reports say that Mr. van Gogh's killer attended the mosque, and though Mr. Zaari said the mosque has no record of him ever being there, he said that political leaders and the news media should encourage the mosque to reach out to militant Muslim youth, rather than stigmatizing it for doing so.

"If they come now," he added, "everyone says, 'Look, the mosque is extremist, and they are plotting something there.' "

Bearded, robed men file in and out of the lobby of the modest brick building that once housed a school. The mosque has been under intense scrutiny for years, suspected of harboring an anti-Western agenda.

It was previously associated with a Saudi-based charity, Al Haramain, which American and Saudi Arabian officials accused earlier this year of aiding Islamic terrorists. The mosque has since severed its ties with the charity, but more recently it has been criticized for selling books espousing extremist views, including female genital cutting and the punishment of homosexuals by throwing them off tall buildings.

Several legislators have called for the mosque to be shut down, but under the Dutch Constitution it is difficult to do.

Mr. Zaari admits Muslims have been slow to respond to the fears within Dutch society. "We didn't feel it was our responsibility to bridge the gap, but now, with the murder, the gap has gotten wider," he said.

"All of us want to begin a dialogue now, but the language of the political right is too extreme, and that's preventing discussion," he said. "We all have to cool down and be careful what we say."

The problem is how to bridge a gap that has yawned dangerously since Mr. van Gogh's killing.

The Amsterdam Council of Churches published paid notices in some Dutch newspapers pledging solidarity with Muslims. But the government's response has been to promise more money to fight terrorism and to adopt stronger immigration laws.

"Islam is the most hated word in the country at this point," said Mr. Bakker, the terrorism expert.